a16z crypto

1 days agoNews Editor

a16z says institutions can move onchain without being trapped by legacy KYC models

a16z crypto argues that the real compliance challenge for banks, brokers and other regulated firms moving onchain is not whether KYC should exist, but how to avoid repeating it across every new venue, wallet and protocol. In a long-form policy piece, the firm says customer identification duties under the Bank Secrecy Act are tied to an institution’s own customers rather than every participant in the underlying settlement network. That distinction, it says, opens room for tokenized products, permissioned pools and reusable identity systems to operate on public blockchains without forcing institutions to replicate legacy compliance architecture in full. The article walks through the legal and operational conditions for reusable KYC, the difference between outsourcing and formal reliance, and how travel rule obligations apply in crypto. It also reviews tools such as verifiable credentials, zero-knowledge proofs, soulbound tokens, wallet screening, asset-level controls, transaction monitoring and cross-chain compliance messaging. Examples cited include Fireblocks OTL, Privado ID, SpruceID, TRUST, LayerZero, Chainlink ACE, Securitize, Ondo, Superstate, Morpho and World ID. The piece also points to recent U.S. policy developments, including the GENIUS Act and FinCEN statements on digital identity, machine learning, generative AI and blockchain analytics. It closes by extending the discussion to AI agents, arguing that reusable identity systems for humans will need a parallel “Know Your Agent” framework to verify who authorized an agent and what it is allowed to do.

60

Vitalik

7 days agoNews Editor

Vitalik says limiting AI by use case is preferable to restricting access by identity

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik said in a post on X that he considers it acceptable for Kimi 3.1 to intentionally exclude advanced offensive cyber capabilities from its training data. In his view, restrictions based on intended use carry far fewer downsides than systems that treat users differently based on who they are. He argued that society still needs time before powerful cyberattacks become widespread, including time to harden systems, review old code, and apply formal verification to new code. Vitalik also warned that if the first major wave of AI risk is handled poorly, the result could be a much more restrictive environment for model access. That could include heavily constrained models, broad KYC requirements, and expanded surveillance, with users sorted into different tiers based on credentials and nationality and given different levels of access.

470

Vitalik Buterin

7 days agoNews Editor

Vitalik Buterin backs excluding top offensive cyber capabilities from Kimi 3.1 training data

Vitalik Buterin said he supports Kimi 3.1 proactively excluding top-tier offensive cybersecurity capabilities from its training data. In his view, restricting use cases is a better approach than restricting users. He said society still needs more time to prepare for stronger AI-driven cyberattack capabilities, pointing to several areas that need work first: hardening system security, reviewing legacy code, and applying strict formal verification to new code. Buterin also warned that if the first wave of major AI risks is handled poorly, the result could be a future of highly closed models, universal KYC requirements, and large-scale surveillance. Under that kind of framework, different users could end up with different levels of model access based on identity, qualifications, or nationality.

350

Kraken

9 days agoNews Editor

Kraken drops Monero withdrawal-use questionnaires and keeps XMR listed

Kraken has removed a questionnaire that asked Monero users about the intended use of coins after withdrawal, while keeping source-of-funds checks in place. According to TheDefiant, Kraken co-CEO Arjun Sethi said it is "unacceptable" to ask clients what they plan to do with coins once they are withdrawn. The report also said Monero, traded under the ticker XMR, remains listed on the exchange. The change appears limited to the withdrawal questionnaire rather than broader compliance checks, as source-of-funds reviews are still being maintained.

550

crypto payments

9 days agoNews Editor

Crypto payments push deeper into the mainstream, with compliance emerging as the key competitive line

Crypto-linked card payments are growing quickly, but the sector’s compliance gaps are drawing sharper scrutiny. Data cited in the article shows monthly stablecoin card spending topped $1.2 billion in September 2026, roughly triple the level a year earlier, while the total stablecoin market cap has nearly doubled over the past two years to more than $300 billion. At the same time, a Crystal Intelligence report published in April said nearly 70% of crypto card providers had weak KYC requirements or none at all, and TRM Labs estimated illicit crypto flows exceeded $158 billion last year. The piece argues that weak KYC is not accidental. It stems from a mix of offshore licensing, intermediary issuing structures, and product designs built around minimal verification. It also links those gaps to sanctions evasion risks, workarounds for geographic restrictions on U.S. AI services, pressure on weaker-currency economies, and reputational exposure for card networks and banks. Against that backdrop, the article says regulators in the U.S., Europe, and Hong Kong, along with Visa and Mastercard, are tightening standards. For compliant providers, the shift changes the role of compliance from a cost center into a market access requirement, affecting banking relationships, issuance capacity, merchant quality, and long-term operating viability.

620

Mastercard

11 days agoNews Editor

Mastercard draws lines between Crypto Credential, KYC, Travel Rule and blockchain screening

Mastercard has outlined how Crypto Credential differs from KYC/AML checks, Travel Rule requirements and blockchain screening, framing them as separate tools used for separate jobs in crypto payments. The comparison says identity verification, transfer-party information and onchain risk alerts should not be treated as interchangeable compliance steps. Instead, each addresses a different part of the payment flow. The key point in the article is that none of these controls automatically determines whether a transaction goes through. Mastercard says the provider handling the payment remains responsible for deciding whether a payment can proceed. That leaves the final judgment with the service provider even when identity checks have been completed, transfer information has been collected, or blockchain monitoring has generated alerts. The source page was only partially available in the provided input, so the report is limited to the facts explicitly shown there and does not add details beyond Mastercard’s stated comparison.

470

WIDTH

18 days agoNews Editor

WIDTH launches limited-time KYC offer for digital asset firms at $0.50 per check

WIDTH, a global compliance technology company, has rolled out a limited-time KYC promotion for the digital asset sector, offering identity verification in about 30 seconds at a discounted price of $0.50 per check. The package also includes KYA wallet address screening and KYT transaction screening. The offer runs through Dec. 31, 2026, and detailed terms can be requested through WIDTH’s official email, marketing@width.com. The company said the program combines document verification, 1:1 facial matching, passive liveness detection, and device and IP risk analysis to help digital asset institutions improve onboarding efficiency and detect risks such as identity misuse and abnormal registrations. By adding KYA and KYT, WIDTH extends risk controls to wallet access, deposits, and withdrawals. WIDTH describes itself as an AI-driven, one-stop compliance and risk decision platform serving financial institutions and digital asset companies. It said it has served more than 500 regulated institutions across over 180 jurisdictions.

570

Bitcoin

23 days agoNews Editor

Seth for Privacy warns a single Bitcoin transaction can undo years of privacy

Cake Wallet chief operating officer Seth for Privacy said one poorly handled Bitcoin transaction can expose years of careful on-chain privacy, especially when users mix non-KYC coins with KYC-linked holdings. Speaking on the Bitcoin Rails podcast, he pointed to UTXO management, often labeled coin control in wallets, as a basic but critical practice for anyone trying to avoid linking their identity to past transactions. His warning comes as Bitcoin privacy has returned to the center of discussion following last year’s trial and imprisonment of Samourai Wallet developers. At the same time, the U.S. Treasury this week dropped two long-delayed crypto surveillance proposals, a move described in the report as a major win for privacy advocates and the digital asset industry. Seth also said attitudes in the West are changing, with more people taking privacy seriously over the past five or six years. He added that while Cake Wallet supports Monero, he would prefer Bitcoin itself to offer privacy strong enough that users would not need a more niche tool to get it.

720

Total 217 items

Go topage

Bit.Fan