Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds posted a combined $239 million in net inflows on July 14, with neither segment seeing outflows during the session. Bitcoin ETFs brought in $181 million, while Ether ETFs added $58.34 million. BlackRock’s IBIT led the bitcoin side with $139 million in net inflows, followed by Fidelity’s FBTC with $21.07 million. On the Ether side, all net inflows went to BlackRock’s ETHA. HYPE, XRP and Solana ETFs recorded no trading activity that day. Separately, Morgan Stanley filed updated amendments for proposed spot Ether and Solana ETFs, and the filings included service providers such as Coinbase Custody as well as staking provisions. In Japan, policymakers are advancing reforms that would place crypto assets under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act classification.
Bitcoin ETFs recorded $181 million in net inflows on July 14, while Ether ETFs saw $58.34 million in net inflows, according to Odaily. Neither bitcoin nor ether ETFs posted outflows during the day.
Within the bitcoin ETF group, BlackRock’s IBIT brought in $139 million in net inflows and Fidelity’s FBTC added $21.07 million. On the Ether side, all net inflows came from BlackRock’s ETHA.
HYPE, XRP and Solana ETFs had no trading activity on the day.
Separately, Morgan Stanley filed updated amendments for proposed spot Ether and Solana ETFs. The filings included service providers such as Coinbase Custody and staking terms. In Japan, policymakers are pushing reforms that would classify crypto assets under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act.
This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan. Disclaimer:
The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.
Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.
