Cathie Wood backs David Sacks’ claim that recent AI doomsday coverage was orchestrated

Cathie Wood backs David Sacks’ claim that recent AI doomsday coverage was orchestrated

N
News Editor
2026-09-13 11:01:56
Cathie Wood said David Sacks, co-chair of the U.S. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, believes recent coverage warning that AI could destroy humanity may have been deliberately orchestrated. According to Wood’s account, the discussion traces back to a long-inactive X account belonging to an Anthropic employee who left the company after just six weeks, after which the claims quickly moved into mainstream media. Sacks also accused parties involved in the episode and criticized the role played by The Wall Street Journal. The dispute comes as debate over frontier AI safety intensifies. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei recently published a long essay calling for a slower pace in advancing frontier AI capabilities, arguing that AI is increasingly being used to help develop the next generation of AI and that several recent agent failures show safety research is not keeping up with capability gains. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman later backed that view, saying the company had also been discussing how to “pace the frontier” in recent weeks and would introduce a similar long-term independent evaluator system. Sacks pushed back, saying companies that truly believe their internal models are dangerous should stop on their own rather than seek a government-backed arrangement among the largest AI firms. He also questioned whether METR is fit to serve as an industry-wide independent judge, while METR said it does not take funding from frontier AI companies and only accepts model access and free tokens.

On Sept. 13, Cathie Wood said David Sacks, co-chair of the U.S. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, thinks the recent wave of coverage saying AI could wipe out humanity may have been pushed on purpose.

As Wood described Sacks’ view, it started with a long-dormant X account linked to a former Anthropic employee. That person was at the company for just six weeks before leaving, and then the claims spread fast into the mainstream press. Sacks also pointed at people tied to the episode and took aim at The Wall Street Journal for its part in it.

Frontier AI safety debate grows sharper

The comments land as the fight over frontier AI safety keeps getting hotter. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei recently put out a long essay arguing for a slower push on frontier AI capabilities. His case: AI is taking a bigger hand in building the next generation of AI, and several recent incidents involving agents slipping out of control suggest safety work is not keeping up with capability gains.

Later, Sam Altman backed that stance. He said OpenAI had also been talking in recent weeks about how to “pace the frontier.” He also said OpenAI would roll out a similar setup for long-term independent evaluators.

Sacks rejects coordinated slowdowns

Sacks, the former White House lead on AI and cryptocurrency and now co-chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, answered with a blunt rebuttal: “If you really think your internal model is dangerous, then stop it yourself.”

He said that once the government is expected to approve things, and then a small group of the biggest AI companies gets together to slow development, it starts looking a lot like a cartel.

METR also comes under scrutiny

Sacks also singled out METR and questioned whether it makes sense for the group to serve as an independent referee for the whole industry. METR has for years carried out outside evaluations for companies such as Anthropic and OpenAI, and Anthropic safety researcher Joe Benton recently left to join the organization.

But METR said plainly that it does not take funding from those frontier AI companies. It only accepts model access and free tokens.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
500

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.