Citrini Analyst Says Nvidia Rubin Ultra HBM Could Drop to 8 Layers, Demand May Rise

Citrini Analyst Says Nvidia Rubin Ultra HBM Could Drop to 8 Layers, Demand May Rise

N
News Editor
2026-08-30 06:03:11
An analyst at Citrini said Nvidia's Rubin Ultra could switch from 12-layer HBM4E to 8-layer HBM, citing sources. OpenAI and Anthropic had asked for 4-layer parts but memory makers rejected the idea, so the cut may stop at 8 layers. Jukan, the analyst, attributes the move mainly to yield and cost concerns: with 12-layer HBM4E and price increases, memory could account for roughly 70% of Rubin Ultra's total bill of materials. Software optimizations such as model quantization, MLA, and computation splitting are moving rarely accessed KV cache and model states to LPDDR, CXL, and NAND, leaving HBM for the active working set. After minimum capacity is met, customers now value bandwidth over capacity. Fewer layers could improve packaging yield and lift HBM and AI accelerator shipments, potentially expanding total HBM demand. Higher bandwidth requirements also reduce the share of wafers passing speed binning, consuming extra DRAM wafer capacity. Longer term, HBM will be replaced by new architectures, likely merging memory and logic; the next two years are critical for memory makers to expand into logic.

Jukan, an analyst at Citrini, said in a post on August 30 that Nvidia's Rubin Ultra could see its HBM configuration drop from 12-layer HBM4E to 8-layer, according to his sources. OpenAI and Anthropic had even requested 4-layer parts, but memory makers refused. The downgrade appears likely to stop at 8 layers.

Yield and cost pressure behind the cut

Jukan attributes the change mainly to yield and cost. If Rubin Ultra used 12-layer HBM4E and price increases were factored in, memory costs could reach roughly 70% of Rubin Ultra's total bill of materials. That makes the choice of stack height particularly sensitive.

Software optimization reshapes memory demand

Software optimizations such as model quantization, MLA, and splitting compute tasks are shifting rarely accessed KV cache and model states to LPDDR, CXL, and NAND. HBM is left mainly for the working set required by current computation. As a result, once minimum capacity is satisfied, customers are placing more importance on HBM bandwidth than on capacity.

Fewer layers, bigger HBM demand?

In Jukan's view, reducing the number of stacked layers improves packaging yield, which can increase shipments of both HBM and AI accelerators. That could actually expand total HBM demand. Meanwhile, higher bandwidth requirements reduce the share of chips passing speed binning on a wafer, consuming additional DRAM wafer capacity.

Long-term: memory and logic converge

Looking further out, Jukan sees HBM eventually being replaced by a new architecture, with the likely endgame being the fusion of memory and logic chips. The next two years will be a critical period for memory makers trying to expand into the logic business.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
2800

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.