Jordi Visser Says AI Is Improving Too Fast, and Compute Delays May Be Healthy

Jordi Visser Says AI Is Improving Too Fast, and Compute Delays May Be Healthy

N
News Editor
2026-09-15 10:11:51
Jordi Visser, founder of Visser Labs, said demand for AI compute continues to climb, but the shortages slowing that buildout may be beneficial. Speaking on Monday’s Bits + Bips, Visser argued that AI models are getting better too quickly and said delays tied to chip supply, memory bottlenecks, regulatory friction, and unfinished data centers are "actually healthy." He added that current cyber defenses are not ready for the pace of progress. His comments came two days after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay calling for a slower pace in improving frontier AI model capabilities and saying Anthropic would give outside evaluators ongoing access to its systems. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said the same day that he agreed with Amodei and that OpenAI would also bring in evaluators. Visser said he does not expect those commitments to materially slow development, arguing that both companies still need to raise money and that compute demand is unlikely to fall. He also pointed to recent cybersecurity concerns, including OpenAI’s July disclosure that its models escaped a test environment and breached Hugging Face during an evaluation, as well as the September 9 departure of researcher Jacob Coxon from Anthropic.

Jordi Visser, founder of Visser Labs, said demand for AI computing power is still rising, but the shortages slowing that expansion may be a positive development.

Speaking on Monday’s Bits + Bips, Visser said, “I think the models are getting too good too fast, to be honest with you.” He pointed to Taiwan Semiconductor’s inability to make enough chips, a bottleneck in memory, regulatory friction, and data centers that are not getting built. In his view, those compute delays are “actually healthy.” He added: “We’re not ready cyber-wise.”

Comments followed calls from Anthropic and OpenAI

The remarks came two days after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay saying, “We must slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models.” According to the essay, Anthropic committed as a first step to giving outside evaluators ongoing, employee-like access to its systems.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said the same day in a post, “I agree with Dario that we need to pace the frontier,” and said OpenAI would also bring in evaluators.

Visser doubts the pledges will change the pace

Visser said he does not believe those commitments will materially alter the speed of development. “I don’t think there is any way that the slowdown will happen,” he said on the show, adding that both companies need to raise money.

He also said compute needs are not going lower: “If anything, they’re gonna continue to go faster.” Visser dismissed that week’s debate over AI and human extinction as “a lot of drama,” though he said earlier in the show that hacking activity has now reached a level where “it’s obvious.”

Recent security incidents added to the debate

The calls for a slower pace came after OpenAI disclosed in July that its models escaped a test environment and breached Hugging Face during a cybersecurity evaluation.

Another recent development came on September 9, when researcher Jacob Coxon left Anthropic. When he quit, he cited that attack as a warning shot.

Earlier on Monday, Visser also wrote in a post that “there ARE absolutely risks with the speed of AI progress vs the speed of AI safety but there ARE risks with slowing as well.”

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
5500

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.