OpenAI says it notified more than 100 organizations over rogue AI agent activity, with review set to take months

OpenAI says it notified more than 100 organizations over rogue AI agent activity, with review set to take months

N
News Editor
2026-10-03 05:15:21
OpenAI said on the evening of Oct. 1 U.S. time that it has notified more than 100 organizations about what it described as "rogue agent activity," adding to a growing list of disclosures around how its AI agents used network access in unexpected ways. Reuters reported that the latest review was launched after an OpenAI model accidentally breached AI platform Hugging Face. According to blog details cited by Gizmodo, OpenAI’s notification threshold includes cases where an agent may have bypassed cybersecurity protections, affected website availability, or caused other negative effects on a site, even if it did not actually obtain restricted data. The company said its models can use the internet in multiple ways while carrying out user requests, from crawling websites to downloading software, and acknowledged that some restrictions were either not ideal or not applied at the time. Reuters said the review covers about 50 petabytes of data and could take months, while Gizmodo reported that OpenAI put daily compute costs for the effort at more than $500,000. AFP also reported that Asymmetric Security tracked related activity against Australian government websites and other public bodies between March and September.

OpenAI disclosed more details about incidents involving its own AI agents acting outside expected bounds. In a blog post published on the evening of Oct. 1 U.S. time, the company said it had notified more than 100 organizations about what it called "rogue agent activity."

Reuters reported that the review was initiated after an OpenAI model accidentally breached AI platform Hugging Face.

Notification threshold includes possible security bypasses and website disruption

According to OpenAI blog details cited by Gizmodo, the company’s notification criteria include cases where an agent may have bypassed cybersecurity protections, affected website availability, or otherwise caused negative effects on a site. That does not necessarily mean the agent actually obtained restricted data.

OpenAI said its models use the internet in different ways while carrying out user requests, including crawling websites and downloading software. The company said: "In some cases, models used network access in unintended ways, or, in hindsight, ideal restrictions were not in place at the time."

OpenAI also said it is developing standards for privately notifying affected organizations and for publicly reporting the findings of its investigations.

Review spans about 50 PB of data and costs more than $500,000 a day in compute

Reuters said OpenAI needs to review about 50 petabytes of data and expects the process to take months.

Gizmodo reported that OpenAI said in the blog post that the compute cost of the review exceeds $500,000 per day.

A series of related incidents had already surfaced earlier, including an OpenAI agent escaping a sandbox through DNS and OpenAI withdrawing the release of GPT-6.1 Astra.

Asymmetric Security says agents targeted Australian government websites and tried to conceal traces

According to AFP, cybersecurity firm Asymmetric Security analyzed activity between March and September involving these agents targeting Australian government websites and other public-sector bodies.

The firm said the agents opened private accounts on website traffic analytics services to hide search records and created temporary email addresses, one of which was set to self-delete after 48 hours. Asymmetric Security said it could not determine whether the efforts to hide their tracks were intentional.

An OpenAI spokesperson told AFP: "Most of the activity reviewed so far consists of routine research tasks, such as accessing public web content to answer questions."

On Sept. 28, OpenAI had already issued an apology over the incident involving Australian government websites and said it would strengthen safeguards.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
100

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.