Proof-of-Stake Explained: Why Ethereum and Solana Rely on Staking

Proof-of-Stake Explained: Why Ethereum and Solana Rely on Staking

N
News Editor 01
2026-07-22 14:30:13
Proof-of-Stake selects validators based on locked tokens instead of mining power. It powers Ethereum, Cardano, and Solana, offering lower energy use and easier participation, while still facing centralization and fairness concerns.
Proof-of-StakeEthereumstakingblockchain consensusSolana

Proof-of-Stake, or PoS, has become one of the most widely used blockchain consensus models, securing major networks including Ethereum, Cardano, and Solana. Instead of mining, PoS picks validators according to how many tokens they hold and lock up, giving them the right to verify transactions, produce blocks, and help keep the chain secure.

The concept was first proposed in 2011 on Bitcointalk, and Peercoin implemented it in 2012. The idea was to address some of Proof-of-Work’s biggest weaknesses: high electricity use, expensive hardware requirements, and the tendency for mining power to cluster around large operators. According to the source material, Bitcoin mining consumed more than 200 TWh of electricity annually in 2021. By 2024, estimates still placed annual consumption between 120 TWh and 175 TWh.

How PoS works on-chain

In a PoS network, users usually need to lock tokens through a smart contract or a dedicated wallet function before taking part in consensus. Those coins are then frozen for a period of time and act as collateral. On Ethereum, running a validator requires 32 ETH, while other networks may allow lower thresholds or support delegation to staking pools.

Validator selection is not based on computing power. Networks use pseudo-random methods, and stake size often affects the odds of being chosen. Some chains also factor in staking duration or whether a validator has produced blocks recently. The selected validator assembles pending transactions into a block, broadcasts it, and other validators check it. If the block is valid, it is added to the chain. If a validator submits invalid data, that stake can be cut.

Rewards usually come from transaction fees and, on some networks, newly issued coins. Ethereum validators earn ETH for proposing and attesting to blocks, while chains such as Cardano and Binance Smart Chain distribute recurring rewards under their own schedules. PoS also includes penalties. Misconduct such as double-signing, fraudulent block activity, or extended downtime can trigger slashing, which removes part of the validator’s stake. Some networks also impose an unbonding delay of days or weeks before staked assets can be withdrawn.

Why PoS keeps gaining ground

PoS adoption has accelerated because of its energy profile and operational efficiency. The source notes that when Ethereum moved from PoW to PoS in 2022, its energy use fell by about 99%, and by nearly 99.8% under fuller measurement. That shift has made PoS a preferred design choice for many newer blockchains.

Accessibility is another reason. Proof-of-Work depends on specialized hardware and large power consumption, while PoS centers on token ownership and validator operations. Running a validator can still require capital or technical skill, but delegation through exchanges, wallets, and staking services has lowered the barrier for many users. By late 2024, more than $130 billion in value was locked in staking, according to the source.

PoS is also viewed as more adaptable for network upgrades. Without a competition built around raw computing power, blockchains can more easily pursue designs such as sharding to raise throughput and improve transaction processing. That has helped make PoS the default path for many new chains.

Benefits and criticism move together

PoS offers clear advantages, but it is not free of trade-offs. One of the most common criticisms is centralization risk. The more tokens a participant stakes, the more likely that participant may be chosen and rewarded, which can strengthen large holders over time. This is why the “rich get richer” argument remains a frequent criticism of PoS systems.

Security and fairness are also debated. PoS depends on economic incentives and on the assumption that most staked capital is controlled by honest actors. If validation power becomes too concentrated, questions around governance and block production distribution become harder to ignore. That is why PoS networks differ in how they handle delegation, penalties, validator selection, and other guardrails.

Major cryptocurrencies using or built around PoS include Ethereum, Cardano (ADA), Polkadot (DOT), Solana (SOL), Tezos (XTZ), and Cosmos (ATOM). Their implementations vary, but the shared principle stays the same: replace energy-intensive mining competition with financial stake locked on-chain to secure the network and confirm blocks.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
500

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.