Quantum Alliance launches with nine crypto firms as asset-freeze debate takes center stage

Quantum Alliance launches with nine crypto firms as asset-freeze debate takes center stage

N
News Editor
2026-10-16 10:58:31
A new Quantum Alliance made up of nine crypto companies was formed on Oct. 16, with plans to draft shared security standards for blockchains including Bitcoin and Ethereum. Publicly named members include security firm Hacken, Charles Hoskinson’s Midnight Foundation, quantum-resistant Layer 1 blockchain Quantus, and Postquant Labs, while the remaining members have not yet been individually disclosed. The group estimates that roughly 6.4 million BTC, or 30.2% of total supply, have exposed public keys. That figure includes about 1.1 million BTC attributed to Satoshi Nakamoto. Even so, the alliance said current quantum computers are still not capable of stealing those funds. The bigger divide is over timing and response. The Vault chief revenue officer Bryn Bennett said no one knows the exact date, though estimates keep moving forward. Postquant Labs CTO Richard Carback said 2028 is a realistic time frame. Their sharpest disagreement centers on whether vulnerable assets should be frozen. Carback favors moving funds instead, while Bennett said any freeze would be a Bitcoin governance decision and would set a precedent of trading property rights and neutrality for quantum-risk mitigation.

A new Quantum Alliance formed on Oct. 16 with nine crypto companies, opening a coordinated effort to create shared security standards for blockchains such as Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Publicly listed members include security firm Hacken, Charles Hoskinson’s Midnight Foundation, quantum-resistant Layer 1 blockchain Quantus, and Postquant Labs. The remaining members have not been individually disclosed.

The alliance estimates that about 6.4 million BTC have exposed public keys, equal to 30.2% of Bitcoin’s total supply. That number includes roughly 1.1 million BTC associated with Satoshi Nakamoto. The group added that current quantum computers are still not capable of stealing those assets.

Members split over timeline and response

The alliance is not aligned on when the threat becomes practical or how networks should respond. Bryn Bennett, chief revenue officer at The Vault, said nobody knows the exact date, but estimates keep moving closer. Richard Carback, chief technology officer at Postquant Labs, said 2028 is a realistic time frame.

The central dispute is whether vulnerable assets should be frozen. Carback favors moving funds rather than freezing them. Bennett said a freeze would be a governance decision for the Bitcoin network, and that any such move would create a precedent of exchanging property rights and neutrality for protection against quantum risk.

Debate echoes earlier proposals

The issue has surfaced before. CZ previously suggested freezing Satoshi’s bitcoin, and developer Jameson Lopp also proposed restricting vulnerable tokens. Critics argued that such measures would conflict with Bitcoin’s promise that funds cannot be confiscated.

The alliance plans to publish shared security tests and migration guidance in the future.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
300

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.