Tenev says Robinhood stock tokens should not automatically need issuer consent

Tenev says Robinhood stock tokens should not automatically need issuer consent

N
News Editor
2026-09-09 20:36:11
Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev said the company’s stock tokens should not automatically require consent from the underlying issuer because they are separate tokenized securities issued by another entity and backed by the referenced shares. Speaking on CNBC’s Squawk Box on Sept. 9, Tenev drew a line between a tokenized product linked to AMC Entertainment stock and an actual AMC share placed onchain. He also acknowledged that holders of the tokens do not receive the voting rights attached to the underlying shares, while Robinhood has yet to say how those votes would be handled. The comments come as Robinhood faces criticism from AMC CEO Adam Aron, who argues that the structure disconnects token demand from AMC’s own capital-raising efforts and strips investors of shareholder rights. Product documents describe the instruments as tokenized debt securities issued by Robinhood Assets (Jersey) Limited, with each token backed one-for-one by corresponding shares held by a U.S. custodian. Robinhood’s disclosures also state the product is unavailable in the U.S. and to U.S. persons.

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev said the company’s stock tokens should not be assumed to require consent from the underlying issuer, even when the tokens reference shares of a public company. He also said token holders do not receive the voting rights attached to those shares.

The remarks came in a Sept. 9 interview on CNBC’s Squawk Box and sharpened the legal and structural distinction at the center of Robinhood’s dispute with AMC Entertainment. Robinhood is not defending an AMC share placed directly on a blockchain. It is defending a separate security tied to AMC stock.

Tenev’s argument on issuer control

Tenev said, according to the interview, 「Issuers should have control and do have control over the rights and obligations of the stock that they issue, but that doesn't mean they control everything about it.」 He added, 「In particular, they don't control other companies issuing their own securities that reference those shares.」

He also said that 「Issuer consent depends on what exactly you're doing.」 In his description, Robinhood’s stock tokens are 「tokenized securities that are issued by a separate entity that are backed by underlying shares」 and therefore 「should not automatically require issuer consent.」

No voting rights for token holders

Tenev acknowledged in the same interview that holders of the tokens do not receive the voting rights attached to the underlying shares. When asked whether Robinhood would vote those shares, he said the company 「hasn't really announced plans for the voting aspect of that.」

That leaves one governance issue open: who will direct the votes tied to the AMC shares being held in custody. Robinhood has not announced a plan for those votes.

A debt token rather than an AMC share

Robinhood’s product documents describe Stock Tokens as tokenized debt securities issued by Robinhood Assets (Jersey) Limited, or RHJ. The documents say the products give investors economic exposure to an underlying security, but no legal or beneficial rights in or against the company that issued that security.

Robinhood’s disclosures identify RHJ, not AMC, as the issuer of the debt securities. The company says each token in circulation is backed one-for-one by the corresponding stock, with the shares held by a U.S. custodian. Service-provider disclosures name Alpaca Securities LLC as the broker and custodian.

For dividends, token holders receive the economics through a mechanism that reinvests cash distributions into additional underlying shares and increases a multiplier applied to the token. Even with that arrangement, holders do not receive legal or beneficial rights in or against AMC through the token, and Tenev confirmed that voting rights are not passed through.

The dispute with AMC

The structure is the core of the clash between the two companies. Tenev’s position is that a separate entity should be able to issue a security referencing publicly traded shares without automatically getting the underlying issuer’s approval. AMC CEO Adam Aron has taken the opposite view, arguing that the product separates token demand from AMC’s capital-raising function and does not grant shareholder rights.

On Sept. 4, Aron wrote on X that Robinhood’s product 「decouples stock token ownership from a company's ability to control its own capital raising efforts.」 He added: 「Your stock token pretend to be some form of stock ownership, but disclosures to the contrary notwithstanding, they are not ownership and they deprive investors of their rights.」

Aron called on Robinhood to stop trading AMC-linked tokens and said AMC’s securities counsel would review whether the company could force a halt.

Unavailable in the U.S.

Robinhood’s documents say Stock Tokens are not available in the United States or to U.S. persons. Eligible investors receive economic exposure through debt securities issued by RHJ and do not receive legal or beneficial rights in or against the underlying issuer.

Tenev’s comments do not settle whether AMC has a legal path to stop the product. They also leave unresolved the question of who will exercise the voting rights attached to the AMC shares held in custody. Robinhood has not announced those plans.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
1300

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.