Redfearn Says SEC Stock-Token Exemption May Give Public Companies a Way to Opt Out

Redfearn Says SEC Stock-Token Exemption May Give Public Companies a Way to Opt Out

N
News Editor
2026-09-14 22:53:41
Brett Redfearn, president of Securitize and former director of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Trading and Markets, said the SEC’s still-unpublished exemption for tokenized stocks will likely include something close to an issuer opt-out. Speaking in an interview recorded on Sept. 10 and published by Unchained, Redfearn said a platform seeking to tokenize a public company’s shares may first need to notify the issuer, which would then have a limited window to object. If the company says no, the shares would stay off the platform; if it stays silent, the tokenization effort could proceed. The SEC has delayed the exemption twice, once in May and again in August. Redfearn said early expectations suggested the framework might not require issuer sign-off at all, a view that drew criticism from the Securities Transfer Association. In a July 1 letter, the group argued any exemption should apply only to issuer-sponsored tokens. The debate has become more visible as Robinhood pushes stock tokens outside the U.S. and faces objections from AMC. Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev has argued that moving shares onchain should not give issuers a veto they never had offchain, except in cases where shareholder rights or official ownership records are altered.

Brett Redfearn, president of Securitize and a former director of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Trading and Markets, said the SEC’s delayed exemption for tokenized stocks will likely let public companies object before a third party puts their shares onchain.

In an interview with Unchained recorded on Sept. 10, Redfearn said, 「I believe that the innovation exemption is likely going to do something akin to an issuer opt-out.」

How the exemption may work

Under the structure Redfearn described, a firm that wants to tokenize a company’s stock would first have to notify the company. The issuer would then get a period of time to respond. Redfearn described it as something like 30 days for the company to say yes or no.

If the company rejects the plan, its stock would stay off the platform. If it does not answer, Redfearn said, 「if they don’t respond, people are gonna go ahead.」

The SEC has not published the exemption. The agency delayed it in May and again in August.

Debate over issuer consent

Redfearn said earlier expectations were that the exemption might not require company approval at all. That idea met resistance, including from the Securities Transfer Association, a trade group representing firms that maintain shareholder records for companies.

In a July 1 letter, the group said any exemption should apply only to 「Issuer-Sponsored Tokens.」 Securitize builds that type of product, putting shares onchain with the issuing company’s involvement.

Robinhood takes a different approach

Robinhood is on the other side of that debate. Its stock tokens, sold to investors outside the United States, drew an objection from AMC this month.

In a post on Friday, Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev wrote that moving stocks onchain should not give the issuer a veto it never had offchain. He said companies should weigh in only when a product changes shareholders’ rights or the official record of who owns the stock.

Voting and in-kind redemption on Robinhood’s roadmap

On Monday, Tenev said in another post that in-kind redemption and voting are coming to Robinhood’s stock tokens.

Redfearn said that if Robinhood brings the offering to the U.S., he believes the SEC will require it to include full security entitlements, including voting, dividends, corporate actions, and similar rights.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
600

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.