Solana switches mainnet to Alpenglow, retiring TowerBFT consensus

Solana switches mainnet to Alpenglow, retiring TowerBFT consensus

N
News Editor
2026-10-21 15:40:00
Solana moved its mainnet to the Alpenglow consensus protocol on Wednesday, ending the network’s use of TowerBFT, the voting system it had relied on since 2020. The official Solana account said at 13:59 UTC that Alpenglow was live, while protocol developer Anza had posted the same update five minutes earlier. Chain data reviewed by Unchained showed the final TowerBFT-era block at slot 459,652,999 around 13:54:00 UTC, with Alpenglow’s genesis certificate pointing to that block. After eight empty slots, slot 459,653,008 arrived at 13:54:03 UTC, and block heights continued sequentially without signs of a rollback. Both Anza and Solana said finality dropped from 12.8 seconds to 150 milliseconds. Under Alpenglow, validators no longer submit votes as transactions. Instead, votes move between nodes as BLS-signed messages aggregated into certificates, a change intended to free blockspace for users. The rollout on Wednesday covers Votor, the voting component of the design, while Rotor, the planned replacement for Turbine’s block propagation system, remains scheduled for a later phase with no date announced.

Solana switched its mainnet to the Alpenglow consensus protocol on Wednesday, retiring TowerBFT, the voting system the network had used since 2020.

The official Solana account posted at 13:59 UTC that Alpenglow was live on mainnet. Anza, the developer behind the protocol, had declared it live five minutes earlier. The chain’s own records also show the transition took place.

Chain data shows how the cutover happened

Queries by Unchained to Solana’s public mainnet RPC found that the final block from the TowerBFT era was slot 459,652,999, stamped at about 13:54:00 UTC. Alpenglow’s genesis certificate points to that block.

Eight slots then passed without a block before slot 459,653,008 appeared at 13:54:03 UTC. Block heights then continued in sequence, with no sign of a rollback.

The timing came in earlier than Anza’s own projections. Unchained had reported on Oct. 14 that the team first set the switch for about 14:50 UTC. Solana Compass later showed the estimate had been moved forward to around 14:00 UTC.

Finality claim set at 150 milliseconds

Both Anza and the Solana account attached the same figure to the change: finality was reduced from 12.8 seconds to 150 milliseconds.

The 12.8-second figure reflects Solana’s earlier 400-millisecond slots. The Solana Foundation has said slot times were later reduced to 200 milliseconds. Galaxy, which operates Solana validators, wrote in a pre-launch explainer that finality had already fallen to roughly 6 seconds under the shorter slots.

What changes for validators

Under Alpenglow, validators no longer submit votes as transactions. Votes now move between nodes as BLS-signed messages and are aggregated into certificates, which frees blockspace for users.

A block can reach finality in one round if 80% of stake votes for it, or in two rounds at 60%.

The design is intended to keep operating with as much as 20% of stake acting maliciously and another 20% offline.

Fee model and reported network metrics will change

Instead of paying per-vote fees, each voting validator now pays a flat 0.8 SOL per epoch.

Galaxy had noted that vote transactions accounted for roughly three quarters of Solana’s traffic. The Solana Foundation expects reported transaction counts and TPS to drop sharply.

Wednesday’s rollout covers Votor, not Rotor

The switch completed on Wednesday covers Votor, the voting half of the design. Rotor, which is meant to replace Turbine’s block propagation system, is planned for a later phase, with no date set.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
100

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.