Korean KOSDAQ Crypto-Treasury Firms Face Delisting Pressure as Higher Listing Thresholds Tighten

Korean KOSDAQ Crypto-Treasury Firms Face Delisting Pressure as Higher Listing Thresholds Tighten

N
News Editor
2026-07-03 13:32:01
A group of KOSDAQ-listed companies in South Korea that built their business narrative around holding Bitcoin and other crypto assets is facing rising delisting pressure. According to the report, these so-called DAT companies followed a model similar to Strategy and Metaplanet, using crypto treasury accumulation as a core capital-market story during bullish cycles. However, that model is now under strain as Bitcoin prices fall, the broader KOSDAQ market weakens, and regulators raise the market-cap threshold for maintaining a listing. The minimum threshold reportedly rises to KRW 20 billion in July and to KRW 30 billion next January. At the same time, new rules are closing loopholes tied to financial maneuvers such as reverse stock consolidation, leaving affected firms with fewer tools to preserve their listed status. The episode underscores how heavily these companies depend on crypto price appreciation for valuation support and earnings optics.
South Korea crypto marketKOSDAQBitcoin treasury strategyRegulationDelisting riskStrategyMetaplanet

KOSDAQ-listed DAT companies are facing concentrated delisting risk

A number of listed companies on South Korea’s KOSDAQ market that center their business model on holding Bitcoin and other crypto assets are now facing more visible delisting pressure. The report refers to these firms as DAT companies. Unlike conventional operating companies, their market narrative depends heavily on the balance-sheet value of crypto holdings and on investor willingness to price those holdings into equity valuations.

That model becomes especially fragile when market conditions reverse. As crypto prices decline, the value of treasury assets falls, sentiment weakens, and equity support can fade quickly. For firms already operating near listing-maintenance thresholds, the combination of asset-price volatility and weak market appetite can turn into a direct listing risk rather than just a temporary valuation issue.

The Strategy and Metaplanet playbook is under pressure in a weaker market

According to the report, these Korean companies had largely adopted a playbook inspired by Strategy and Metaplanet. The core idea was straightforward: accumulate Bitcoin or other crypto assets, align the company’s market identity with that treasury strategy, and benefit from a bullish cycle in which rising coin prices could lift both perceived asset value and stock-market attention.

During favorable market conditions, that approach can amplify valuation upside. But it also creates a strong dependence on continued appreciation in crypto prices. Once Bitcoin falls sharply, the same mechanism works in reverse. Treasury values decline, earnings visibility deteriorates, and the company’s valuation narrative loses strength. In that environment, the DAT model is exposed as highly cyclical and closely tied to external market moves rather than durable operating fundamentals.

Higher market-cap rules and tighter oversight reduce room for survival tactics

Regulatory changes are a major reason the pressure is intensifying now. The report says the KOSDAQ market-cap threshold for delisting has been raised to KRW 20 billion in July, and will increase further to KRW 30 billion next January. For DAT companies whose valuations are heavily supported by crypto-market momentum, this means the bar for staying listed is becoming materially harder to clear.

Just as important, the new rules reportedly close loopholes that had allowed some firms to rely on financial or technical maneuvers, including reverse stock consolidation, to maintain listing status. With those options constrained, companies that lack stable core operations and depend primarily on crypto price appreciation may have limited ways to defend their market capitalization. As a result, firms that once benefited from a bull-market treasury narrative are now confronting a much more demanding regulatory and market environment.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
300

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.