On-chain analyst @FabianoSolana said suspected North Korean hackers moved about $1.46 million through Jupiter Lend and Circle’s cross-chain bridge. According to the analysis, the funds first left an FBI-tagged Solana wallet beginning with AffzFD, passed through an intermediary wallet, were split across roughly 35 temporary addresses, then reconsolidated and deposited into Jupiter Lend. Minutes later, a different newly created wallet withdrew a similar amount.
The funds were then swapped into USDC and bridged out of Solana through Circle, moved through Noble and dYdX, and later returned to a new address on Solana. The analyst said about $1.4634 million was sent out in 16 transactions and returned in 19 transactions, with only about a $10 difference between the outbound and inbound amounts. The analyst also said the funds had not been frozen.
Jupiter Chief Operating Officer Kash Dhanda said the attacker only used Jupiter Lend for deposits and withdrawals, not the kind of structure seen in the earlier Aave case involving stolen stablecoins and borrowing assets that could not be frozen. He added that the fund flows remain fully traceable through LP tokens and that the links between wallets were not broken. As of publication, Circle had not publicly responded to the transfer or to questions over why the funds were not frozen.
On-chain analyst @FabianoSolana said suspected North Korean hackers moved about $1.46 million through Jupiter Lend and Circle’s cross-chain bridge.
Funds moved out of an FBI-tagged Solana wallet
According to the analyst, the funds initially left an FBI-tagged Solana wallet address beginning with AffzFD. They were sent to an intermediary wallet, split across roughly 35 temporary addresses, then reconsolidated and deposited into Jupiter Lend.
Minutes later, another newly created wallet withdrew a similar amount from Jupiter Lend. The funds were then converted into USDC and bridged out of Solana through Circle. After moving through Noble and dYdX, they returned to a new address on the Solana network.
Outbound and returned amounts were nearly identical
The analyst said about $1.4634 million was transferred out in 16 transactions and then sent back in 19 transactions. The difference between the outbound and returned amounts was about $10. According to the analyst, the funds were not frozen.
Jupiter says wallet links remain traceable
Jupiter Chief Operating Officer Kash Dhanda said that, based on the investigation so far, the attacker only used Jupiter Lend for deposit and withdrawal activity. He contrasted that with the earlier Aave case, where stolen stablecoins were used to borrow assets that could not be frozen.
Dhanda said the movement of funds can still be fully tracked through LP tokens, and the relationships between the wallets have not been severed. In his view, that means the attacker cannot be said to have cleaned the origin of the funds through Jupiter Lend. Jupiter’s security team has been monitoring the movement of the funds in real time.
As of publication, Circle had not publicly responded to the transfers or to the reason the funds had not been frozen.
This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan. Disclaimer:
The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.
Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.