Tesla Said to Review China Business Split or Sale Ahead of Potential SpaceX Merger

Tesla Said to Review China Business Split or Sale Ahead of Potential SpaceX Merger

N
News Editor
2026-07-31 02:56:44
Tesla executives have been instructed to assess whether the company should separate its China operations, according to The Wall Street Journal, which cited a person familiar with the matter. The review is tied to a possible merger with SpaceX, a scenario Elon Musk said earlier this month he would not rule out as the two companies’ businesses increasingly overlap. Gwynne Shotwell, SpaceX’s president and chief operating officer, said in a June CNBC interview that a combination could make Musk’s cross-company management easier. The core issue is regulatory sensitivity in China. SpaceX is both a participant in U.S. national security satellite programs and a defense contractor, which could create legal and geopolitical conflict if Tesla’s wholly owned manufacturing assets and supply chain in China were folded into a combined company. JPMorgan analysts described Chinese regulatory approval as the key bottleneck. Tesla’s advisers are said to be weighing three routes: a spin-off, a sale, or a shutdown. The company is also discussing a separate sales entity for exports from its Shanghai plant and tighter internal segregation of systems access. The dilemma is significant because Gigafactory Shanghai, with annual capacity above 950,000 vehicles, is one of Tesla’s most important production hubs and a major export base for Europe and Asia-Pacific.

Tesla executives have been told to evaluate a separation or sale of the company’s China business, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing a person familiar with the matter. The move is being examined as a way to clear regulatory obstacles ahead of a potential merger with SpaceX.

The idea has gained traction as discussion around a Tesla-SpaceX combination has picked up. Elon Musk said earlier this month that he would not rule out a merger between the two companies, pointing to growing overlap between their businesses. In a June interview with CNBC, SpaceX President and Chief Operating Officer Gwynne Shotwell said a merger might make Musk’s cross-company management “a little easier.”

China operations emerge as a central merger hurdle

According to the report, one of the biggest problems in any Tesla-SpaceX deal is SpaceX’s dual role. The company is an important participant in U.S. national security satellite programs and also serves as a defense contractor to the U.S. government, making it highly sensitive in the eyes of Chinese regulators.

If Tesla and SpaceX were merged, Tesla’s wholly owned manufacturing plant and supply-chain assets in China would come into direct legal and geopolitical conflict with U.S. defense interests. Unlike most foreign automakers that entered China through joint ventures, Tesla operates there through a fully owned structure. That arrangement once gave Tesla a commercial edge. In this situation, it has become a major complication.

JPMorgan analysts said obtaining approval from Chinese regulators would be the key bottleneck for such a merger.

Three options under review: spin-off, sale, or closure

The report said Tesla advisers are discussing three possible routes for separating the China business: a spin-off, a sale, or a direct shutdown.

At the same time, senior executives are considering setting up a separate sales entity for exports from the Shanghai factory. They are also discussing isolation measures that would prevent China-based employees from directly accessing office systems used by other business units.

The report added that Musk had already asked Tesla executives years ago to build what was described as a “laser-like” firewall between U.S. and China operations. The goal was to preserve the U.S. side of the business if geopolitical tensions between the two countries were to intensify. Even so, the timeline for any separation of Tesla’s China business remains unclear, and the plan is still subject to change.

Shanghai factory would be difficult to give up

Any decision to carve out the China business would force Tesla to reconsider one of the most important manufacturing assets in the global auto industry. Gigafactory Shanghai is the company’s largest and most efficient plant, according to the report. It has annual capacity of more than 950,000 vehicles, contributes more than half of Tesla’s global deliveries, and serves as an export hub for Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.

Its cost advantage is tied to a deeply localized supply chain. China-made Model 3 and Model Y vehicles have local parts content above 95%, supported by about 400 domestic suppliers. More than 60 of those suppliers also serve Tesla’s other factories worldwide.

In the second quarter of this year, total sales and exports from the Shanghai plant rose 32.8% from a year earlier. In June alone, China deliveries of the Model 3 and Model Y climbed more than 24.4% year over year.

Tesla faces a difficult trade-off in its second-largest market

China is Tesla’s second-largest sales market after the United States. The company is also dealing with intensifying competition there from domestic automakers including BYD.

Spinning off the China business would mean giving up a large local supply chain and what the report described as Tesla’s lowest-cost production base. Keeping it, on the other hand, could leave a SpaceX merger stuck in regulatory review for an extended period.

The report also noted that SpaceX completed a record-setting $86 billion IPO last month. As of Thursday’s close, its stock was down 16.8% from the offering price, giving it a market capitalization of about $1.48 trillion. Tesla’s market value was listed at about $1.22 trillion.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
11200

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.