IOSG says HIP-3 lowers the gate to launching perpetual markets, but not the moat
IOSG Ventures argues that Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 has made it possible for more teams to launch perpetual markets, but not to build durable defenses. Drawing directly from Hyperliquid’s public APIs and Flowscan routing data, the report says 10 teams have registered their own perp venues on Hyperliquid and most locked roughly $40 million in HYPE to do it. Yet one venue, Trade[XYZ], still accounted for 97.8% of HIP-3 volume over the past 30 days, even after its own monthly turnover dropped 44.2%. The study says HIP-3 builder markets represented 25.8% of total Hyperliquid perpetual volume over the last 30 days, down from 57.1% in the previous 30-day window. IOSG attributes much of that shift to a booming core crypto book rather than a clean transfer of share away from HIP-3. It also argues that settlement asset choice has been decisive: every venue that used a non-USDC stablecoin has already stopped trading, while every venue still alive uses USDC. IOSG’s broader conclusion is that assets, listing slots and staking capital can all be bought, while the harder thing to copy is market infrastructure itself. In the report’s framing, the only meaningful edge seen so far has come from infrastructure such as oracles, funding-rate design, settlement logic and distribution, not from simply listing a different set of markets.


![IOSG says Hyperliquid’s builder market remains heavily concentrated as Trade[XYZ] keeps 97.8% share](https://image.bit.fan/image/506b71cfb45d77e9745582f95a7bc9d8.jpg)





