AscendEX Withdrawal Anomaly Reflects Survival Crisis for Mid-Small Exchanges: Hack History, Lack of Reserves

AscendEX Withdrawal Anomaly Reflects Survival Crisis for Mid-Small Exchanges: Hack History, Lack of Reserves

N
News Editor
2026-06-26 20:32:03
AscendEX (formerly Bitmax) has been reported to experience large-scale withdrawal failures, with user funds stuck in 'Initiating' status and no on-chain transaction hashes, indicating potential liquidity depletion. The exchange was hacked by the Lazarus group in 2021, losing $78 million, and has long lacked Proof of Reserves and third-party audits. This incident highlights the existential challenges faced by small and medium crypto exchanges under tightening regulation and market centralization.
AscendEXwithdrawal anomalyliquidity crisismid-small exchangeshackProof of Reservesregulationsurvival challenge

Event Overview: Withdrawal Anomaly and Liquidity Concerns

User reports indicate that AscendEX (formerly Bitmax) has recently faced widespread withdrawal issues. Funds remain stuck in an 'Initiating' state for extended periods, without any corresponding on-chain transaction hash. This condition is widely interpreted by the market as a sign of liquidity depletion—meaning the platform may be unable to fulfill withdrawal requests, trapping funds in its internal system rather than sending them out on-chain.

Past Security Incident and Transparency Deficiencies

Notably, this is not the first crisis for AscendEX. In 2021, the exchange suffered a $78 million hack attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group. Although the platform managed to resume operations after securing new investments, it has never published a Proof of Reserves or undergone a third-party audit, keeping its transparency at a low level compared to industry peers. This information asymmetry further amplifies user concerns about fund safety.

Industry Context: The Common Predicament of Mid-Small Exchanges

The AscendEX incident is not an isolated event. With regulatory tightening (e.g., MiCA, US state licensing requirements) and the dominant position of top-tier exchanges such as Binance and Coinbase, small and medium exchanges face mounting survival pressure. Rising customer acquisition costs, higher compliance thresholds, and limited liquidity and market-making resources make these platforms vulnerable to bank-run risks when technical issues or market volatility occur. AscendEX's current situation epitomizes this industry-wide struggle.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
500

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.