Balancer Labs is winding down operations following a $128 million exploit, handing over control of the protocol to its decentralized autonomous organization (DAO). Co-founder Fernando Martinelli confirmed that the November 3, 2025 incident created ongoing legal exposure, making it untenable to maintain a centralized legal entity. Dissolving Balancer Labs allows the protocol to evolve without being burdened by past liabilities.
$128M Exploit Triggers Legal Pressure and Structural Reset
Attackers exploited a rounding flaw in the swap logic of Balancer v2 pools across multiple blockchain networks, draining approximately $128 million. The breach bypassed safeguards, causing significant financial losses and weakening user and liquidity provider confidence. Martinelli explained that the scale of the exploit introduced long-term legal concerns tied to accountability and operational risk. Keeping a corporate entity active would have placed unnecessary risk on contributors, so dissolving Balancer Labs became a strategic move to protect stakeholders while letting the protocol operate independently.
DAO Takes Control, Core Operations Restructured
With the corporate entity stepping aside, governance responsibility shifts directly to the DAO and its supporting entities. Core contributors are expected to transition into a new operational structure called Balancer OpCo, pending a governance vote. The restructuring includes halting $BAL token emissions to reduce inflationary pressure and phasing out the veBAL governance model to simplify participation and align incentives. This shift reflects a broader move toward a leaner model with reduced reliance on traditional corporate structures.
Revenue Holds Steady Despite Overhaul
The protocol continues to generate revenue through its existing infrastructure. Martinelli noted that Balancer produces over $1 million in annualized fees, indicating ongoing activity within its liquidity pools. The technology remains functional, even as the economic model faced pressure. The updated fee structure directs all protocol fees to the DAO treasury and reduces the V3 share to 25%. A BAL buyback plan will provide exit liquidity for token holders. Development efforts will focus on core products and fewer blockchain networks to improve efficiency and long-term sustainability.
This event marks a significant case of a DeFi protocol responding to centralized entity risks. Balancer Labs' dissolution and DAO takeover could serve as a reference for other projects facing similar dilemmas. The protocol's steady revenue and functional technology show that decentralized governance can maintain fundamentals in a crisis.

