CFTC sends two rules to the White House in bid to tighten control over prediction markets

CFTC sends two rules to the White House in bid to tighten control over prediction markets

N
News Editor
2026-09-30 18:39:21
The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission has sent two rule proposals to the White House that would reshape how federal law treats prediction-market event contracts. Submitted to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs on Sept. 28, the filings focus on the legal definition of a "swap," a classification that sits at the center of an escalating fight over who regulates yes-or-no contracts traded on platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket. One proposal would explicitly include event contracts within the swap definition and move to public comment, while the other, issued as an interim final rule, would exclude "casino-style gambling products" and could take effect once approved. The texts have not yet been released publicly, and the CFTC said neither rule is economically significant. The move comes as multiple states pursue prediction-market operators over alleged illegal gambling, while the CFTC argues that if the contracts are swaps, oversight belongs to the federal agency rather than state gambling regulators. The dispute has already produced conflicting appeals-court rulings and is now drawing the attention of the U.S. Supreme Court.

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission is moving to lock in its authority over prediction markets, sending the White House two rule proposals that would redraw the legal definition of a "swap" around event contracts, the yes-or-no wagers traded on platforms including Kalshi and Polymarket.

CFTC sends two rules to the White House in bid to tighten control over prediction markets 2

The agency submitted both proposals to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, the White House office that reviews federal rules before publication, on Sept. 28.

Two filings target the swap definition

The first proposal, identified as RIN 3038-AF82, is a proposed rule that would further define the term "swap" and explicitly include event contracts. It will move to public comment.

The second filing, RIN 3038-AF81, is an interim final rule that would exclude "casino-style gambling products" from the swap definition and could take effect once approved.

The CFTC classified both rules as not economically significant. Their full text has not yet been made public.

Jurisdiction fight centers on whether event contracts are swaps

The swap label sits at the center of a fierce jurisdictional dispute. If event contracts are treated as swaps, they fall under CFTC authority. Chairman Michael Selig has argued that this authority is exclusive, a position that would place the platforms outside the reach of state gambling regulators.

Multiple states have sued prediction-market operators, alleging illegal gambling. The CFTC has responded with countersuits aimed at blocking that oversight. The rulemaking arrives after a series of conflicting appeals-court decisions over whether the contracts qualify as swaps, a split that is now drawing the attention of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Broader regulatory push continues

According to Decrypt, the move fits a broader pattern of the CFTC pushing ahead with its own rules instead of waiting for Congress, part of a post-Clarity Act shift toward regulators setting crypto policy.

The agency recently sent a separate crypto-markets rulemaking to the White House. At the same time, CFTC staff warned that "mention" contracts tied to public statements invite manipulation.

Federal scrutiny is also continuing on other fronts. The CFTC is investigating former Rep. Adam Kinzinger over Kalshi bets tied to his own pardon. Earlier this week, the Commission issued an advisory warning against "mention markets," saying prediction-market contracts that settle on whether a named person says certain words should be presumed readily susceptible to manipulation.

New York also moves against Polymarket

At the state level, New York last week sued Polymarket in an effort to ban the platform within its jurisdiction, echoing an earlier action against Kalshi.

For now, the CFTC filings signal intent rather than final rules. Still, by trying to write the swap definition itself, the agency is attempting to settle through regulation what courts and states have been fighting over case by case.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
500

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.