‹ BackNewsForeign exchange

Foreign exchange

Ueda's Rate-Hike Hint Led to First US-Japan Joint Yen Intervention in 28 Years
‘Sell America’ Trade Returns as Washington Policy Signals Pressure the Dollar and Treasuries
Silver rises to $59.691 an ounce as gold, crude oil and European equities edge higher
USD/JPY rises to 157.513 as oil and European equities post intraday gains
Yen carry tra
2026-08-03 19:36:10

US-Japan yen intervention reshapes carry trade risk, but rate gap still drives the bigger trend

Japanese officials said Tokyo coordinated with the US Treasury to buy yen, and both President Donald Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent later confirmed US participation while leaving the door open to another joint operation. After those statements, USD/JPY pulled back sharply from levels near 164 seen last week, at one point falling to around 155.20, while an Associated Press reading on the morning of Aug. 3 showed the pair near 156.34. A Reuters photograph taken on July 31 added another layer to the story. Bessent’s notepad at a Camp David cabinet meeting included the line: "To Do: Buy Japanese Yen (JPY) $5-10 bil." That note does not confirm how much was actually bought, and the US Treasury had not formally verified a figure at the time. Even so, the image suggested Washington had considered a purchase large enough to matter to leveraged traders. The intervention has changed the risk profile of yen-funded carry trades rather than erased the strategy outright. The Federal Reserve kept its federal funds target range at 3.50% to 3.75% on July 29, while the Bank of Japan left its short-term policy rate at 1% on July 31. Japan’s financing choices also matter for global markets: Bessent said the Federal Reserve’s FIMA repo facility was used in the operation, a mechanism that can provide dollar liquidity against Treasuries without requiring immediate outright sales.

1900
US-Japan yen intervention reshapes carry trade risk, but rate gap still drives the bigger trend
helping infor
2026-08-03 10:10:11

Lawyer argues Help-Info-Network-Crime charges require an upstream offense carried out through information networks

A MarsBit commentary by lawyer Shao Shiwei uses a case involving alleged illegal foreign-exchange dealing through virtual currency to argue that a failure to prove illegal business operations does not automatically justify a fallback charge of helping information-network criminal activity. Shao says the upstream conduct in such cases must itself qualify as a crime "committed through information networks," rather than a traditional offline offense that merely used tools such as WeChat, Telegram, online banking, or virtual currency somewhere in the process. The article says existing legal and judicial documents governing the offense do not directly define what "using information networks to commit a crime" means. On that basis, Shao argues prosecutors should have to prove that threshold element instead of treating it as self-evident. His proposed test is that the information network must play a substantial and central role in the execution stage of the upstream offense. If the network appears only in contact, planning, or post-offense disposal while the core criminal conduct is completed offline, the requirement is not met. The piece also reviews three broad approaches seen in practice and academic debate: a broad reading, a restrictive reading, and a middle-ground view. Shao says his position is closer to the restrictive and middle-ground approaches. A follow-up article, according to the piece, will analyze three typical matching foreign-exchange models in more detail.

420
Lawyer argues Help-Info-Network-Crime charges require an upstream offense carried out through information networks
USD/JPY drops 170 points in 15 minutes, breaks below 156 for first time since May 6
China’s foreign exchange regulator says AI and big data will be used to strengthen oversight