How Trade[XYZ] Built 92 Markets on Hyperliquid and Reached 98% of HIP-3 Volume
A data-heavy analysis by Mohit Pandit, translated by TechFlow and cited by MarsBit, argues that Trade[XYZ] should be viewed as a value-add to Hyperliquid rather than a threat to it. Using data through June 2026, the report says Trade[XYZ] built institution-grade perpetual markets for equities, indexes, commodities and FX in just eight months, now accounting for roughly 98% of HIP-3 volume across 92 listed markets. The core claim is that Hyperliquid’s model is working as designed. Trade[XYZ] handles market deployment and day-to-day risk operations, while Hyperliquid keeps the exchange layer, user activity, front-end flow, auction demand and a share of fees. The report says about 97% of trading in Trade[XYZ] markets still happens through Hyperliquid’s own app and API, not through third-party front ends, and that these markets have brought more than 300,000 distinct wallets to the platform. The analysis also breaks down market depth, onboarding speed, maker concentration, fee structures and risk controls such as discovery bounds, liquidation protection and reduced funding multipliers for pre-IPO products. It estimates HIP-3 traders have paid about $37.9 million in fees so far, with roughly $14.3 million flowing to Hyperliquid’s protocol share and HYPE buybacks, and another $14.3 million accruing to the deployer. The author’s broader point is that Trade[XYZ] has shown HIP-3 can support professional operators building deep non-crypto perpetual markets on top of a neutral exchange base.
![How Trade[XYZ] Built 92 Markets on Hyperliquid and Reached 98% of HIP-3 Volume](https://image.bit.fan/image/548d2859364925ce186d52fc153c8105.png)







