Machine Learning

Runway
2026-10-01 14:30:53

Runway says Praxis-1 brings internet video pretraining to robots with results close to specialist datasets

Runway has introduced Praxis-1, a robotics model that applies techniques developed for AI video training to real-world robots. The system learns from large volumes of ordinary internet video, using those clips to model how objects move and how people complete tasks, then converts that knowledge into robot actions. In an object placement test, Runway said robots pretrained on internet video posted an average error of 16.1 centimeters. When trained instead on specially collected robot teleoperation video, the average error was 16.0 centimeters. The company said the benchmark covered 93 evaluations, with the two training approaches finishing nearly even. Runway argued that if this approach scales, the amount of usable training data for robotics could expand by orders of magnitude, since teleoperated robot data requires hardware, physical space, and human labor, while ordinary video is already abundant online. Praxis-1 has been tested on multiple robots from Noble Machines, Standard Bots, and Ultra, including robotic arms, dual-arm systems, and mobile robots. The company also showed the same policy continuing a task after moving from a studio setting to a kitchen. Praxis-1 is currently available only through an early access application, while model weights are planned for release in the coming months. Parameter count and fuller independent evaluations have not yet been disclosed.

740
Runway says Praxis-1 brings internet video pretraining to robots with results close to specialist datasets
NVIDIA launches Kumo Tabular, a tabular foundation model that predicts new rows in one forward pass
NVIDIA opens applications for its 2027-2028 graduate fellowship program
McDonald’s uses AI pricing engine to adjust menu prices by willingness to pay
TMLR
2026-09-26 04:49:11

TMLR editor tested whether authors understood their own papers. All 10 flagged submissions were rejected

Transactions on Machine Learning Research, or TMLR, has published a firsthand account of a small editorial experiment that speaks to a broader problem facing academic publishing in the AI era. In a Sept. 16 blog post, co-editor-in-chief Nihar B. Shah of Carnegie Mellon University said that during his Aug. 14-28, 2026 rotation, he pulled 10 submissions that were already headed for desk rejection and invited the authors to discuss their papers before any external review. The result was stark. One paper was withdrawn, one author declined the call, one no-showed, and Shah ultimately spoke with authors of seven papers. Only one author answered all questions. Three could explain the high-level idea but struggled on technical details. Three others could not answer even basic questions about the problem setup, notation, or where the abstract’s claims were supported in the paper. Those three were all single-author submissions. Even the one strongest case was rejected after Shah found a major error in a central conclusion, though resubmission was allowed after correction. The post also outlines how TMLR is responding to a surge in submissions: author quotas, AI-generated reliability reviews, and a stronger requirement that papers clearly communicate their findings. Shah argues the issue is not whether AI was used, but whether named authors can stand behind the work.

600
TMLR editor tested whether authors understood their own papers. All 10 flagged submissions were rejected
Pluralis team has three papers accepted to NeurIPS 2026
TypeSafe AI’s Jev spread to about 13% of Vercel’s paid teams within 24 hours of launch
FLock Research gets three papers accepted to ECML PKDD 2026 on complex LLM reasoning