‹ BackNewsOptical modules

Optical modules

Serenity
2026-08-29 13:15:23

Serenity: Sivers Photonics' Sweden Focus Risks Trapping Its Valuation

Serenity, the investor known as the 'White-Hair Stock God,' has publicly questioned Sivers Photonics' (SIVE) current strategy, arguing that the company remains overly focused on the Swedish market while US investors are more likely to reward its future growth potential and the real economic value of its order book. According to Serenity, American analysts would be more interested in what Sivers' two recent wafer fab capacity allocations actually mean—and, with supply bottlenecks and rising average selling prices (ASP), how much revenue and operating leverage those volumes could translate into. Serenity also said topics like NPO/CPO, pluggable optical modules, the 2028 volume ramp of CPO makers such as Ayar, the ELS product collaboration with O-Net, and the scale and potential total addressable market (TAM) of six newly added pluggable customers deserve deeper discussion. By contrast, local market participants keep pressing management on 'how to stop the bleeding,' why private customers cannot be disclosed, why the company is focused on transceivers, and what the 'business opportunity pipeline' actually means—forcing management to spend considerable time defending itself instead of talking about future growth. Serenity believes the more time Sivers spends on the Swedish market, the more its valuation becomes constrained by Swedish market investment logic, and it should therefore present its growth opportunities and their economic value more aggressively to US investors.

1050
Serenity: Sivers Photonics' Sweden Focus Risks Trapping Its Valuation
Indium Phosph
2026-08-19 23:03:10

China’s grip on indium phosphide is tightening pressure on the CPO supply chain

Indium phosphide has moved to the center of the optical supply chain as AI data center buildouts drive demand for high-speed optical modules and co-packaged optics, or CPO. The article argues that China now holds critical leverage across all three major steps of the indium phosphide chain: primary indium smelting, indium refining, and wafer manufacturing. That position has become more consequential after Beijing expanded export controls from indium phosphide products to upstream indium itself. The report details how pressure is building across the industry. Lumentum’s CEO said earlier this month that the shortage in indium phosphide is even more severe than in memory, while Nokia has moved to secure production by acquiring facilities tied to indium phosphide manufacturing. Coherent, a major supplier of indium phosphide laser products used in Nvidia’s CPO systems, is also highlighted as scrambling to secure supply as customers push for more capacity. At the same time, Chinese companies including Yunnan Germanium and Zhuzhou Keneng are seeing stronger orders and making progress on larger wafers and higher-purity indium products. Still, the article says two constraints remain unresolved: customer qualification cycles and capacity expansion. Even with Chinese suppliers gaining ground, the gap between projected global demand and effective supply remains large heading into 2026.

1860
China’s grip on indium phosphide is tightening pressure on the CPO supply chain
US Stocks Rise, S&P 500 Hits Record; SanDisk Surges 13.6% on CFO Outlook
Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink respond to Nvidia investment rumor
Policy and Re
2026-08-11 06:54:08

Citi says proposed U.S. curbs on Chinese optical modules have not advanced beyond the idea stage

Citi said in an Aug. 9 research note that the reported U.S. move to block Chinese optical modules from the American market has not yet become an effective ban under existing Federal Communications Commission rules. Reviewing FCC Order 26-50, the bank said optical modules do not appear on any active restricted list. They are mentioned only once in an example tied to hardware and software bill-of-materials disclosure, not in the ban section. The bank outlined three possible regulatory routes: restrictions tied to specific manufacturers, restrictions based on all foreign production locations, and a narrower origin-based approach aimed only at products made in China. Citi judged the manufacturer-based route the least likely and said origin-based restrictions are more plausible, though near-term enforcement remains unlikely. Its main argument is supply. Citi estimated Chinese suppliers account for 60% to 70% of high-speed optical modules used by U.S. hyperscalers. Non-Chinese suppliers, in its view, cannot close that gap in the short run, while domestic U.S. production lines still need time to ramp. The report also singled out Eoptolink and DSBJ as the most exposed among the companies discussed, while Tianfu Communication was described as relatively insulated because it supplies passive components that do not fall within the current restricted-list framework.

2380
Citi says proposed U.S. curbs on Chinese optical modules have not advanced beyond the idea stage
JPMorgan sees 28% CAGR in optical modules market, with NPO and CPO taking over after 2028
US FCC Moves to Ban Chinese Optical Modules, Raising AI Buildout Concerns