SVM

Fogo
2026-08-30 03:14:53

Fogo Pauses Mainnet to Halt Movement of Affected Assets After Breach

Fogo, an SVM Layer 1 network, said on August 30 that it had temporarily halted mainnet operations as a precautionary step after detecting unauthorized activity, in an effort to stop the continued transfer of affected assets. During the suspension, Fogo will upgrade its network and restrict addresses associated with the incident. The team said further updates would follow once more details are confirmed, and urged users to get information only from Fogo's official channels, warning that no other source should be relied upon for updates. So far, the cause of the incident, the scale of the affected assets, and the expected timing for the mainnet's restoration have not been disclosed. The move follows an earlier attack on the Fogo Foundation by an unknown hacker, which resulted in roughly 400 million FOGO tokens being transferred to an attacker-controlled address. The foundation said it had notified relevant trading platforms immediately and was in active communication with law enforcement and forensic experts.

40
Fogo Pauses Mainnet to Halt Movement of Affected Assets After Breach
SVM
2026-08-30 01:39:53

Fogo Halts SVM Mainnet Temporarily Over Unauthorized Activity

SVM public chain Fogo temporarily halted its mainnet in the past hour after detecting unauthorized activity. The precautionary shutdown aims to prevent further transfers of affected assets. During the halt, the network will be upgraded to restrict addresses linked to the incident. Fogo plans to share further updates once more information is confirmed and urges users to rely only on official channels.

50
Fogo Halts SVM Mainnet Temporarily Over Unauthorized Activity
Prediction Ma
2026-08-11 08:00:46

Trepa and Fireplace shut down as prediction markets tilt toward a Kalshi-Polymarket duopoly

Two prediction-market projects with very different strategies announced shutdowns on Aug. 10, highlighting how hard it has become for smaller teams to survive as volume and attention cluster around Kalshi and Polymarket. Trepa, a Solana-based app built around numerical accuracy rather than binary outcomes, said its final playable market will end on Aug. 12, 2026. The app will stay online until Sept. 30 so users can withdraw funds, then go offline. Fireplace, a professional trading terminal built on top of Polymarket, said trading will stop on Aug. 15 and the site will close at 23:59 UTC on Sept. 30. Trepa’s founders said they had bet that users would pay for precision, not just for picking the right direction. Its post-mortem pointed to several problems: higher cognitive load than binary markets, a concurrency model that required many users to participate in the same narrow time window, and an addressable audience far smaller than expected. Fireplace gave fewer details, but market feedback repeatedly focused on its roughly 1% trading fee, which some users said was too expensive compared with trading directly on Polymarket. Their exits come as the sector becomes more concentrated. According to the source article, Kalshi and Polymarket were far ahead of all other rivals in trading volume as of June 21, with Kalshi’s growth rate already outpacing Polymarket’s. The article argues that once giants control liquidity and order flow, new mechanisms and third-party interfaces face a much narrower path to becoming sustainable businesses.

1100
Trepa and Fireplace shut down as prediction markets tilt toward a Kalshi-Polymarket duopoly
Bitcoin
2026-08-06 06:29:41

Hashi’s 25-Plus Institution Stress Test Puts Focus on Where Bitcoin Programmability Should Live

Hashi’s testnet on Sui has drawn participation from more than 25 institutions in a push to let Bitcoin take part in DeFi without leaving the Bitcoin network. The article argues that the market debate has shifted: the question is no longer whether BTC should be programmable, but where that programmability should sit. Hashi keeps the underlying BTC in 2-of-2 multisig Bitcoin addresses while execution happens on Sui, a setup the author says improves asset safety but still leaves users relying on two systems at once. Against that backdrop, TuringBitChain, or TBC, is presented as a different route. Rather than splitting assets and contract logic across chains, it says it writes Turing-complete smart contracts directly into the UTXO model at Layer 1. The piece contrasts the two approaches across trust assumptions, architecture, performance claims, developer trade-offs, and institutional readiness, framing the broader contest around whether programmable BTC finance will be built through external execution layers or within UTXO itself.

1100
Hashi’s 25-Plus Institution Stress Test Puts Focus on Where Bitcoin Programmability Should Live