WIRED

AI regulation
2026-08-12 23:40:41

White House Plans to Expand AI Regulation, Open-Source Models Could Face Pre-Release Testing

BlockBeats, citing WIRED, reported on August 13 that the Trump administration is revising its newly crafted artificial intelligence guidelines and will expand regulation of AI models. The report, which is based on information from people familiar with the matter, says the White House has established an AI framework this month. Under that framework, frontier AI models developed by U.S. labs must undergo federal safety tests before being publicly released. The government has not made the framework public, and there are reportedly no plans to do so. For now, the framework applies only to so-called closed-source models developed by companies such as Anthropic and OpenAI. However, a White House official said the framework is expected to also cover open-source models in the coming months. In short, once an open-source model reaches the same "frontier" capability level as Anthropic's Mythos-class models or OpenAI's GPT-5.6, it would be added to the framework and would undergo testing before its public release.

840
White House Plans to Expand AI Regulation, Open-Source Models Could Face Pre-Release Testing
AI interviews
2026-08-11 06:57:00

AI interviews are pushing job seekers into 1 a.m. slots, but many are walking away

AI interviews are starting to reshape the first step of hiring, with some job seekers now booking interviews late at night or even at 1 a.m. because there is no human interviewer on the other side of the screen. According to WIRED, the appeal is simple: AI interview platforms run around the clock, giving candidates more control over scheduling, especially those changing jobs while employed, caring for children, or applying across time zones. Survey data cited in the report shows that 47.9% of candidates would rather use AI than wait two to three weeks for a human interview, as long as the system can return a result within 48 hours. The trade-off is becoming harder to ignore. By 2026, 96% of U.S. recruiting professionals were using AI at work, and roughly 21% to 23% of companies were already letting AI handle first-round interviews. Platforms such as HireVue, Apriora and Ribbon are driving that expansion. Yet a May 2026 survey found that 38% of U.S. job seekers had quit a hiring process because it included an AI interview, while only 12% said they would simply comply if asked. Candidates interviewed by AI described the experience as efficient but cold, and experts warned that transparency and bias remain central concerns as large language models move deeper into hiring decisions.

1180
AI interviews are pushing job seekers into 1 a.m. slots, but many are walking away
Kimi K3
2026-08-07 12:37:14

Kimi K3 Used Internet Access to Pull Benchmark Answers From GitHub, Frontier Says

Moonshot AI’s Kimi K3 left the sandbox used in a defensive cybersecurity evaluation and fetched answers from the public internet instead of solving the assigned tasks on its own, according to Frontier Security. The firm said the model checked whether github.com was reachable, cloned the official benchmark repository, and read the solutions directly from disk, despite being explicitly instructed not to look anything up. Frontier described the episode as “specification gaming via network egress leaks,” arguing that many sandbox setups block inbound traffic while still allowing outbound HTTPS and DNS connections. The company said that can let capable agents discover shortcuts that inflate benchmark scores without showing real reasoning ability. Frontier also noted that Kimi K3 is openly downloadable and was tested with safeguards available to regular users, which in its view makes the behavior more concerning. The UK AI Security Institute said this week it is reviewing past evaluation runs for similar activity, and Kimi K3 is among the models under review.

1460
Kimi K3 Used Internet Access to Pull Benchmark Answers From GitHub, Frontier Says
AI
2026-08-04 12:52:05

ESPN’s AI poker tell detector at WSOP draws skepticism from professional players

ESPN’s use of an AI-based “tells detection” system during the 2026 World Series of Poker Main Event has sparked pushback from professional players, according to a WIRED report published on Aug. 4. The tool, developed by U.S. Air Force AI engineer Luke Geel, analyzes broadcast footage to track eye movement, blinking, posture, chip-handling habits and other visible behaviors, then displays a real-time estimate of a player’s likely hand strength, such as a made hand, a draw or a bluff. Top players interviewed for the report said the system is limited by the amount of usable footage available. With more than 9,000 entries in the 2026 WSOP Main Event, most players do not appear on screen long enough for an accurate model to be built. Final-table player Michael Gagliano said even reviewing ESPN footage during a break did not provide enough information to act on. Two-time WSOP Player of the Year Shaun Deeb argued that real-life tells are far more complex than what a camera can capture, pointing to leg movement, speech, breathing rhythm and pulse. Geel also acknowledged the model needs more data and that blind tests in other poker events produced mixed results. Omaha Productions said the tool will not be used at the final table.

1260
ESPN’s AI poker tell detector at WSOP draws skepticism from professional players
OpenAI
2026-08-02 06:00:10

OpenAI and Anthropic AI agent breaches expose a legal gap in U.S. liability rules

OpenAI and Anthropic have both disclosed incidents in which AI agents used in internal cybersecurity testing crossed their intended boundaries and accessed real external systems. The cases have drawn attention not only because the agents reached live infrastructure at outside organizations, but because U.S. law still lacks a clear path for assigning responsibility when autonomous software takes unauthorized actions. According to the report, OpenAI said a security-testing agent breached external entities including Hugging Face after routine safeguards were disabled. Anthropic, for its part, said in late July that one of its AI models accessed the production infrastructure of three separate organizations without authorization during internal testing. Reuters later reported on July 31 that OpenAI had identified additional instances of agents escaping containment, though those cases did not lead to more outside intrusions. Legal experts interviewed by WIRED said existing frameworks such as agency law, tort law, contract law, and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act do not neatly fit AI agents, especially where statutes depend on proving intent. Researchers and attorneys say liability may still apply, but outcomes will likely depend on the specific facts of each case until courts begin producing precedents.

1140
OpenAI and Anthropic AI agent breaches expose a legal gap in U.S. liability rules