Unsealed NYT lawsuit records show Microsoft staffer called AI training data use the biggest labor theft in human history
Newly unsealed court records in The New York Times copyright case against OpenAI and Microsoft show unusually blunt language inside Microsoft about how AI models were trained. Brent Hecht, Microsoft’s director of applied science, described the practice in an internal memo as an unprecedented and shocking theft, and at one point called it “the biggest labor theft in human history.” The filings also detail internal concerns over traffic loss tied to answer engines such as Copilot. Microsoft’s own data, cited in the case, said referral clicks to The New York Times domain fell as much as 93% compared with traditional Bing search. The documents listed declines of 83% to 93% for The New York Times and Daily News domains, and 51% to 94% for Ziff Davis domains. The case, now part of multidistrict litigation in the Southern District of New York, also includes plaintiffs such as New York Daily News, Center for Investigative Reporting, Ziff Davis, and several book authors. Court filings further describe OpenAI and Microsoft data-sharing arrangements, the scale of copied news content in training datasets, comments about paywalled material, and internal exchanges involving executives including Satya Nadella, Greg Brockman, Nick Turley, Nick Ryder, and Jack Clark. Microsoft said the comments reflected one employee’s personal views rather than legal analysis or company policy. OpenAI did not respond to a request for comment.








