Nature

Quantum Compu
2026-10-19 01:01:12

FlipFlop Tuoyuan, a neutral-atom quantum startup, reportedly raised two rounds within weeks of launch

Quantum computing startup FlipFlop Tuoyuan has emerged as a new entrant in China’s neutral-atom quantum computing field, according to a report by QbitAI republished by MarsBit. Corporate records cited in the report show the company was established on July 2 this year. Within a little more than a month of incorporation, it had already completed two financing rounds, with total funding reaching several hundred million yuan. People close to the company told the outlet the rounds were a seed round and an angel round, and that investors included Source Code Capital, Oasis and CICC. The report said the company is led by Qiao Mu, born in 1996, who studied environmental science at Shandong University before earning a PhD at Tsinghua University and later conducting postdoctoral research under the French National Centre for Scientific Research. It also outlined his publication record, including work in Nature, Nature Physics and Science Advances, and said he had previously explored academic positions in China before choosing to start a company instead. FlipFlop Tuoyuan is said to be building around neutral-atom quantum computing, with one investor saying the company is designing its full-stack architecture around fault-tolerant computing needs and treating a 100-logical-qubit system as a key R&D target. The report also said the startup wants to adopt an AI-native research model, bringing AI into experiment design, data processing and equipment control.

1010
FlipFlop Tuoyuan, a neutral-atom quantum startup, reportedly raised two rounds within weeks of launch
Schrödinger
2026-10-16 16:01:41

Schrödinger says machine learning simulations uncover atomic-level behavior in lithium-ion battery electrolytes

Schrödinger has published a new lithium-ion battery study in Nature, saying its team worked with researchers from Columbia University and the New York Structural Biology Center to identify how battery electrolytes behave at the atomic level. The company said the work used its physics-based AI computing platform and machine learning force field technology to move battery research beyond trial-and-error methods toward predictive design. According to the report, the study focused on electrolyte chemistry, which affects conductivity, viscosity, salt dissociation, electrochemical stability, and the formation of the solid electrolyte interphase on the anode surface. Schrödinger said earlier efforts to model complex battery chemistry often forced researchers to choose between quantum-level accuracy and large-scale simulations. Vice President Mat Halls said the company’s machine learning force field removed that trade-off. The team reported that lithium ions in electrolyte frequently form clusters coordinated by ethylene carbonate solvent molecules, and that these clusters can exist without anions. The study said as much as 40% of lithium ions cluster in standard electrolyte conditions, with clustering becoming more common in high-salt systems. Schrödinger added that its simulation results were consistent with experimental measurements including NMR spectra, electrolyte density, viscosity, ionic conductivity, and diffusion coefficients. The company said the findings could offer data support for designing faster-charging, higher-capacity, and longer-lasting lithium-ion batteries.

610
Schrödinger says machine learning simulations uncover atomic-level behavior in lithium-ion battery electrolytes
University of Tokyo builds 0.6 nm 2D semiconductor as TSMC is reportedly backing 12-inch wafer goal
AI
2026-09-20 00:45:10

Nature examines whether AI can recreate Einstein-style breakthroughs, and why the answer is still no

Nature has spotlighted a line of research sometimes framed as an "Einstein test": place an AI model inside a tightly limited historical knowledge boundary and see whether it can produce genuinely new scientific explanations rather than repeat what later generations already know. The idea, discussed by Nobel laureate and Google DeepMind co-founder Demis Hassabis, asks whether a system restricted to the knowledge available in the early 20th century could reason its way toward discoveries comparable to relativity. One of the most visible attempts came from independent researcher Michael Hla, who trained GPT-1900, a 3.3 billion-parameter Transformer model built on pre-1900 books, newspapers, and historical physics texts. In one experiment, the model produced wording that resembled Einstein's 1905 light-quantum argument, suggesting that light might consist of separate parts rather than a continuous wave. Even so, Hla said the model failed on most physics tasks and remained far from truly rediscovering the theory. Nature's review points to a larger problem. Even if a model can generate a plausible explanation, that does not show it can identify the right question, judge which theory matters, or validate its own ideas. The GPT-1900 setup also relied in part on modern models such as Claude Sonnet 4 and Claude 3 Haiku for instruction generation and reinforcement-learning evaluation, making a fully sealed historical test difficult to prove.

740
Nature examines whether AI can recreate Einstein-style breakthroughs, and why the answer is still no
Fudan's Neolab Introduces 'Life Operator' for Unified Modeling of Life Phenomena