‹ Backrisk on

risk on

altcoin marke
2026-07-29 03:03:23

How altcoin market-making can create hidden sell pressure through token loans and call options

A TechFlowPost feature, translated from a WuBlockchain article, argues that one of the least visible forces in the altcoin market is the standard agreement many projects sign with market makers before token generation events. The structure described in the piece is simple on paper: projects lend tokens to a market maker and attach a call option, often with a strike set 25% to 100% above the TGE price and a term of 12 to 24 months. In practice, the article says, that setup can create persistent sell pressure outside official unlock schedules, because market makers may rationally sell borrowed inventory and buy it back lower if spot stays well below the strike, or hedge near the strike by selling into rallies. The article uses Movement Labs’ MOVE token as a case study because details of its market-making arrangement reportedly surfaced through social media, investigation threads and community discussion, including holdings, strike prices and borrowed token amounts. It frames that episode not as an exception but as a rare window into a broader market structure. The piece also links this issue to three long-running asymmetries in crypto: access to leverage, access to shorting and access to information. It says perpetual futures helped democratize leverage, on-chain shorting protocols such as Shortit are trying to broaden directional access for long-tail tokens, and on-chain disclosure of market-maker loan terms could tackle the last gap by exposing the incentive parameters that shape supply in the secondary market.

1880
How altcoin market-making can create hidden sell pressure through token loans and call options
HTX Research
2026-07-27 09:05:30

HTX Research says RWA and DeFi are moving into the next phase of programmable finance

HTX Research argues in a new report that the tokenized real-world asset, or RWA, market has moved past basic proof of concept and is now being judged on whether on-chain assets can actually be used inside financial systems. The report says the non-stablecoin tokenized asset market grew from under $3 billion in mid-2024 to more than $30 billion in April 2026 before stabilizing around $34 billion in the second quarter of 2026. In its view, that rise shows that traditional assets can be issued, settled and managed on-chain, but it does not yet prove large-scale financialization. The report pairs that argument with a similar shift in decentralized finance. HTX Research says DeFi is moving away from valuation frameworks centered on TVL and headline scale, and toward models based on revenue quality, risk costs, treasury allocation and how value is transmitted to tokens. It uses Aave as a case study, describing the lending protocol as a key meeting point between stablecoins, tokenized collateral and on-chain credit markets. HTX Research also says stablecoins, RWA products and DeFi protocols are forming a three-layer structure for on-chain finance: stablecoins as the cash leg, tokenized assets as collateral and yield-bearing instruments, and DeFi protocols as the layer for trading, lending, leverage and risk transfer. The report closes by tying these themes to HTX’s own products, including Earn, Structured Products, On-chain Earn and margin-based coin exchange, which it says translate institutional narratives into products retail users can actually use.

560
HTX Research says RWA and DeFi are moving into the next phase of programmable finance
Robinhood
2026-07-26 11:22:32

IOSG says Robinhood’s new L2 keeps trading, settlement and tokenized assets inside its own stack

IOSG’s latest deep dive argues that Robinhood is no longer renting blockspace from someone else’s network. By launching its own Layer 2, the company now controls the rails for trading, settlement, collateral, yield and asset circulation, a move the report frames as a direct answer to Coinbase’s Base. Robinhood Chain was built for tokenized equities and broader real-world asset activity, yet its first wave of traction came from meme coins and AI agents rather than stocks. As of July 20, 2026, IOSG said RWA assets still accounted for only about 4% of total value locked. The report lays out a layered structure around the chain, including USDG as the main settlement dollar, USDe as a yield-bearing collateral asset, Wallet as the user entry point, and separate perpetual venues such as Lighter and Arcus. It also spends considerable time on the legal structure of Robinhood’s stock tokens, describing them as tokenized debt securities issued by Robinhood Assets (Jersey) Limited rather than direct ownership of underlying shares. IOSG’s conclusion is that the infrastructure economics already make sense for Robinhood, but the unresolved question is whether meme-driven traffic can be converted into durable RWA activity and whether the company will eventually publish reserve proof for its stock token model.

2620
IOSG says Robinhood’s new L2 keeps trading, settlement and tokenized assets inside its own stack
Goldman Sachs
2026-07-25 07:20:30

Goldman Sachs flags three reflexive loops weighing on global markets

Goldman Sachs says global markets are being pressured by three self-reinforcing loops that are starting to feed on one another: the interaction between oil prices and politics, rising capital spending by hyperscale cloud companies, and growing stress in AI infrastructure debt. In a client note this week, Rich Privorotsky, head of 1-Delta trading at Goldman Sachs, argued that the combination has left markets sitting on what he described as a fragile and dangerous equilibrium. The report points to Brent crude briefly moving above $100 a barrel, a level that challenged assumptions about how quickly U.S. policy might respond if higher gasoline prices began to hurt political support. At the same time, investors are becoming less willing to treat giant AI-related spending plans as costless growth signals. Google raised its 2026 capital expenditure guidance to $195 billion-$205 billion, reported negative free cash flow of $5.9 billion for the quarter, and saw its shares fall 6.9%. Privorotsky also highlighted pressure in financing markets tied to AI buildouts, citing Meta’s $27.3 billion "Hyperion" financing through Beignet SPV. The bonds were issued at par, later traded above 109, and have since fallen back to around 95. He said the next key tests for this broader thesis will be Microsoft’s earnings call and ChangXin Memory Technologies’ listing on Shanghai’s STAR Market.

1380
Goldman Sachs flags three reflexive loops weighing on global markets